{
  "name": "Unum11 report-quality benchmark",
  "description": "Per-category rubric scores for 6 automatically generated business-intelligence reports, covering entity scales from a single-location restaurant to a $3.9B contractor.",
  "publisher": "Unum11",
  "url": "https://unum11.com/benchmark/",
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-26",
  "caveats": [
    "Self-administered: the rubric was written by Unum11 and run against Unum11 output. It is not an external audit.",
    "The same rubric scores a real McKinsey Global Institute report 409/1000 with 3 categories at zero, which measures this rubric's house bias rather than that report's quality.",
    "One row per company (best run). Repeat runs of the same company land within a few points and are excluded as dependent observations.",
    "Counts of VERIFIED / CREDIBLE_ESTIMATE / DOCUMENTED_GAP markers are deliberately omitted: they differ by an order of magnitude between renderers and would compare typesetting conventions, not evidence discipline.",
    "Companies named are analysed from public sources. None is a Unum11 client."
  ],
  "rubric": {
    "total": 1000,
    "floor": 584,
    "floorMeaning": "Awarded for having no detectable defect. A flawless report that demonstrates nothing scores exactly this.",
    "earned": 416,
    "earnedMeaning": "Additive, starts at zero, awarded only for analytical properties the document demonstrates.",
    "perfectScoreAttainable": false,
    "categories": [
      {
        "key": "A",
        "name": "Zero fabrication",
        "maxPoints": 191
      },
      {
        "key": "B",
        "name": "Entity scale",
        "maxPoints": 95
      },
      {
        "key": "C",
        "name": "Financial rigour",
        "maxPoints": 143
      },
      {
        "key": "D",
        "name": "Simulation insight",
        "maxPoints": 143
      },
      {
        "key": "E",
        "name": "Recommendation substance",
        "maxPoints": 143
      },
      {
        "key": "F",
        "name": "Research completeness",
        "maxPoints": 95
      },
      {
        "key": "G",
        "name": "Narrative coherence",
        "maxPoints": 76
      },
      {
        "key": "H",
        "name": "Honesty",
        "maxPoints": 38
      },
      {
        "key": "I",
        "name": "Visual and technical",
        "maxPoints": 76
      }
    ]
  },
  "summary": {
    "companies": 6,
    "bestScore": 887,
    "medianScore": 848,
    "totalWords": 35237,
    "totalCitations": 245
  },
  "reports": [
    {
      "company": "Digerati Technologies, Inc.",
      "entityScale": "Small-cap public",
      "score": 887,
      "maxScore": 1000,
      "gradedOn": "2026-08-22",
      "words": 8176,
      "sections": 9,
      "outboundCitations": 29,
      "categoryScores": {
        "A": {
          "name": "Zero fabrication",
          "points": 171,
          "maxPoints": 191
        },
        "B": {
          "name": "Entity scale",
          "points": 95,
          "maxPoints": 95
        },
        "C": {
          "name": "Financial rigour",
          "points": 128,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "D": {
          "name": "Simulation insight",
          "points": 123,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "E": {
          "name": "Recommendation substance",
          "points": 127,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "F": {
          "name": "Research completeness",
          "points": 68,
          "maxPoints": 95
        },
        "G": {
          "name": "Narrative coherence",
          "points": 61,
          "maxPoints": 76
        },
        "H": {
          "name": "Honesty",
          "points": 38,
          "maxPoints": 38
        },
        "I": {
          "name": "Visual and technical",
          "points": 76,
          "maxPoints": 76
        }
      },
      "passedAllMechanicalChecks": true,
      "note": "Highest to date. Six actions ranked by expected value per unit of execution risk, each with an explicit cost of inaction."
    },
    {
      "company": "KORU Medical Systems, Inc.",
      "entityScale": "Small-cap public",
      "score": 886,
      "maxScore": 1000,
      "gradedOn": "2026-08-24",
      "words": 6630,
      "sections": 14,
      "outboundCitations": 82,
      "categoryScores": {
        "A": {
          "name": "Zero fabrication",
          "points": 191,
          "maxPoints": 191
        },
        "B": {
          "name": "Entity scale",
          "points": 95,
          "maxPoints": 95
        },
        "C": {
          "name": "Financial rigour",
          "points": 143,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "D": {
          "name": "Simulation insight",
          "points": 103,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "E": {
          "name": "Recommendation substance",
          "points": 111,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "F": {
          "name": "Research completeness",
          "points": 68,
          "maxPoints": 95
        },
        "G": {
          "name": "Narrative coherence",
          "points": 61,
          "maxPoints": 76
        },
        "H": {
          "name": "Honesty",
          "points": 38,
          "maxPoints": 38
        },
        "I": {
          "name": "Visual and technical",
          "points": 76,
          "maxPoints": 76
        }
      },
      "passedAllMechanicalChecks": true,
      "note": "The only run to take full marks on zero-fabrication (191/191) and financial rigour (143/143) together. Most externally cited report: 82 outbound sources."
    },
    {
      "company": "Xenetic Biosciences, Inc.",
      "entityScale": "Small-cap public",
      "score": 849,
      "maxScore": 1000,
      "gradedOn": "2026-08-22",
      "words": 3969,
      "sections": 13,
      "outboundCitations": 9,
      "categoryScores": {
        "A": {
          "name": "Zero fabrication",
          "points": 171,
          "maxPoints": 191
        },
        "B": {
          "name": "Entity scale",
          "points": 85,
          "maxPoints": 95
        },
        "C": {
          "name": "Financial rigour",
          "points": 143,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "D": {
          "name": "Simulation insight",
          "points": 103,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "E": {
          "name": "Recommendation substance",
          "points": 111,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "F": {
          "name": "Research completeness",
          "points": 68,
          "maxPoints": 95
        },
        "G": {
          "name": "Narrative coherence",
          "points": 61,
          "maxPoints": 76
        },
        "H": {
          "name": "Honesty",
          "points": 31,
          "maxPoints": 38
        },
        "I": {
          "name": "Visual and technical",
          "points": 76,
          "maxPoints": 76
        }
      },
      "passedAllMechanicalChecks": true,
      "note": "A micro-cap with a thin public record — the case where inventing figures is most tempting. Nine citations, and the report is shorter because it refused to pad."
    },
    {
      "company": "Edible Garden AG Inc",
      "entityScale": "Small-cap public",
      "score": 846,
      "maxScore": 1000,
      "gradedOn": "2026-08-26",
      "words": 9367,
      "sections": 19,
      "outboundCitations": 71,
      "categoryScores": {
        "A": {
          "name": "Zero fabrication",
          "points": 171,
          "maxPoints": 191
        },
        "B": {
          "name": "Entity scale",
          "points": 95,
          "maxPoints": 95
        },
        "C": {
          "name": "Financial rigour",
          "points": 143,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "D": {
          "name": "Simulation insight",
          "points": 103,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "E": {
          "name": "Recommendation substance",
          "points": 111,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "F": {
          "name": "Research completeness",
          "points": 55,
          "maxPoints": 95
        },
        "G": {
          "name": "Narrative coherence",
          "points": 61,
          "maxPoints": 76
        },
        "H": {
          "name": "Honesty",
          "points": 31,
          "maxPoints": 38
        },
        "I": {
          "name": "Visual and technical",
          "points": 76,
          "maxPoints": 76
        }
      },
      "passedAllMechanicalChecks": true,
      "note": "Longest and most structured: 19 sections including six standalone research chapters."
    },
    {
      "company": "Granite Construction Incorporated",
      "entityScale": "Global enterprise",
      "score": 817,
      "maxScore": 1000,
      "gradedOn": "2026-08-25",
      "words": 4296,
      "sections": 13,
      "outboundCitations": 17,
      "categoryScores": {
        "A": {
          "name": "Zero fabrication",
          "points": 171,
          "maxPoints": 191
        },
        "B": {
          "name": "Entity scale",
          "points": 85,
          "maxPoints": 95
        },
        "C": {
          "name": "Financial rigour",
          "points": 143,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "D": {
          "name": "Simulation insight",
          "points": 103,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "E": {
          "name": "Recommendation substance",
          "points": 95,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "F": {
          "name": "Research completeness",
          "points": 68,
          "maxPoints": 95
        },
        "G": {
          "name": "Narrative coherence",
          "points": 45,
          "maxPoints": 76
        },
        "H": {
          "name": "Honesty",
          "points": 31,
          "maxPoints": 38
        },
        "I": {
          "name": "Visual and technical",
          "points": 76,
          "maxPoints": 76
        }
      },
      "passedAllMechanicalChecks": true,
      "note": "Largest entity tested, ~$3.9B revenue. Held scale discipline: no small-business tooling advice for a national contractor."
    },
    {
      "company": "Peppers Cantina",
      "entityScale": "Local SMB",
      "score": 750,
      "maxScore": 1000,
      "gradedOn": "2026-08-18",
      "words": 2799,
      "sections": 15,
      "outboundCitations": 37,
      "categoryScores": {
        "A": {
          "name": "Zero fabrication",
          "points": 175,
          "maxPoints": 191
        },
        "B": {
          "name": "Entity scale",
          "points": 95,
          "maxPoints": 95
        },
        "C": {
          "name": "Financial rigour",
          "points": 127,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "D": {
          "name": "Simulation insight",
          "points": 123,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "E": {
          "name": "Recommendation substance",
          "points": 20,
          "maxPoints": 143
        },
        "F": {
          "name": "Research completeness",
          "points": 82,
          "maxPoints": 95
        },
        "G": {
          "name": "Narrative coherence",
          "points": 30,
          "maxPoints": 76
        },
        "H": {
          "name": "Honesty",
          "points": 31,
          "maxPoints": 38
        },
        "I": {
          "name": "Visual and technical",
          "points": 67,
          "maxPoints": 76
        }
      },
      "passedAllMechanicalChecks": true,
      "note": "The only non-public entity in the set, and the clearest demonstration of the ceiling: research completeness scores highest here (82/95) while recommendations score lowest (20/143)."
    }
  ]
}