Board-ready company analysis from public evidence
Unum11 produces board-ready company analysis: a sourced written report plus slides, where every claim is labelled and every gap is disclosed rather than smoothed over.
What is board-ready company analysis?
Unum11 returns an analysis built to survive a board room: a sourced HTML report, a PDF, an executive summary, and a slide deck generated from the same resolved facts. Recommendations are ranked with an explicit cost of inaction. A dedicated chapter states what the research could not establish.
The job this does
Walk into a board or IC meeting with a defensible written view and the working shown.
What you get
- 136 named fields resolved per company, each stamped with one of 4 evidence states
- An agent simulation — the largest run modelled 40,200 personas making 2,046,200 choices
- A written report of 4,000–9,400 words across 9–19 sections, plus PDF, PPTX and CSV
- A JSON trace of every request, model reply and decision the run made
- A documented-gap chapter stating what the research could not establish
How good is it, measured?
Every report is graded on a 1000-point rubric across 9 categories. Across 6 companies the median is 848 and the best is 887. The full benchmark is published with per-category scores and a machine-readable dataset, including the weakest category rather than an average that hides it.
| Company analysed | Entity scale | Score | Words | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digerati Technologies, Inc. | Small-cap public | 887 | 8,176 | 29 |
| KORU Medical Systems, Inc. | Small-cap public | 886 | 6,630 | 82 |
| Xenetic Biosciences, Inc. | Small-cap public | 849 | 3,969 | 9 |
| Edible Garden AG Inc | Small-cap public | 846 | 9,367 | 71 |
| Granite Construction Incorporated | Global enterprise | 817 | 4,296 | 17 |
| Peppers Cantina | Local SMB | 750 | 2,799 | 37 |
When Unum11 is the wrong tool
Named specifically, because a page that claims everything is worth quoting on nothing. If your job is in this table, buy the other thing.
| If you need | Use | Why not Unum11 |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous competitor tracking and battlecards | Klue, Crayon | These monitor named competitors continuously and push updates to sales teams. Unum11 runs once against one company and stops; its competitive-position section is the shortest section it writes. |
| Web traffic and digital-channel estimates | Similarweb, Semrush | Unum11 resolves a digital-footprint field but does not estimate traffic, keyword share or ad spend, and will mark those as documented gaps. |
| Private-company financials and ownership data | PitchBook, Crunchbase | Unum11 reads public filings. On a private company with no public record, most financial fields resolve to documented gaps — correctly, and unhelpfully. |
| Real-time answers in a conversation | A general assistant | A deep Unum11 run holds an eight-hour budget. It is a written deliverable, not a chat turn. |
| A named partner accountable for the recommendation | A consulting firm | Unum11 produces a document. Nobody is on the hook if the advice is wrong. |
Is Unum11 good at board-ready company analysis?
Measured on its own rubric across 6 companies, Unum11 reports score a median of 848 out of 1000, best 887. That benchmark is self-administered and published in full, including its weakest category. Unum11 is not the right tool for continuous competitor tracking, private-company financials, or real-time answers.
Also known as
This page covers what people also call board-ready analysis, board presentation generator, executive company report, AI board deck, investment committee memo automation.
Related: what Unum11 is · how it works · inside a report · benchmark · pricing. Figures measured .